Re: chemical equilibrium



In article <e_vEj.15680$4q3.6@trndny02>, Marvin <physchem@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ron Jones wrote:
b201b402cd21c3@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Consider the reaction:

A -> B + C

If the reactor already has substantial B and C in it, the reaction
will not proceed as far to the right as it would without B and C (Le
Chatelier).

What if the reactor has substantial C, but no B in it? Will the
reaction still proceed as though it had been devoid if both B and C?

It's too dependant on the rate constants to generalize.
A -> B + C can also be the equation for a firework / runaway reaction - the
presence of extra C will slow the reaction (by absorbing heat and reducing
the temperature rise), but it's still going to go to completion.

The heading on the original post was "chemical equilibrium".
The question was evidently about an equilibrium reaction.

Yes it was ... but the equation as written is mostly not at eqilibrium but
is reactant to products (ie implies that it goes at least mostly to
completion).
Were this really an equilibrium, it should be written more accurately as
A <=> B + C

There's still the small matters of equilibrium constants and rates of
reactions of course. :)




.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT: New Climate Pact!
    ... as in 'reaction in a test tube for a vanishingly small ... >time' and test tube as in 'sodding great machine'. ... >Mike Pentz joined a team working on fusion reaction not long after the ... Indeed, JET first fired up their reactor 22 years ago, and it has been used ...
    (uk.comp.sys.mac)
  • Re: Science journalism, SciAm, and Chez whatever.
    ... Scientific American in particular. ... The whole reaction takes less than 50 milliseconds. ... Dreyer also notes that their reactor could work ... I think I could make a reactor where no more carbon comes out of the ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: New star wars moivie
    ... Don't forget Lando. ... Lando shot the reactor directly, ... a chain reaction that eventually blew the reactor. ... I thought that hitting the reactor was what started the chain reaction ...
    (alt.fan.starwars)
  • Re: chemical equilibrium
    ... What if the reactor has substantial C, ... reaction still proceed as though it had been devoid if both B and C? ... Ron Jones ... and I'm not certain about the universe. ...
    (sci.chem)
  • Re: chemical equilibrium
    ... What if the reactor has substantial C, ... reaction still proceed as though it had been devoid if both B and C? ... If the reaction starts with any amount of either B or C, or both, the concentrations at equilibrium are affected. ...
    (sci.chem)