Re: Hydrogen for cars

Yevgen Barsukov wrote:
On Jun 27, 2:47 am, "Ian Macmillan" <iand...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Uncle Ben" <b...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:ddb82064-f1ed-404b-88e8-af3b092f22f7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jun 25, 11:43 am, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <dirk.bru...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Ian Macmillan wrote:
The main value of hydrogen is at its endpoint of use in a fuel cell. The
considerable difficulties of manufacture, storage, transport and safety
probably rule out its practical use in bulk, except as a political
boondoggle.
However, there are a variety of methods using chemical reactions that
could
produce hydrogen from water at the point of use, so that the need for
bulk
hydrogen is eliminated. A recent example uses aluminium amalgamated with
gallium, but similar schemes, some using iron, have been around for
thirty
years.
To produce hydrogen from water using electricity is very inefficient,
and
uses far more energy than can be recovered from the resulting hydrogen,
quite apart from the cost of handling the bulk product.
Ultimately the sun is the only feasible source of energy that is
independent
of mineral resources, whether realised as heat, electricity or
mechanical
power. Fusion power is, as always, potential.
Primary energy can be used to directly produce an energy carrier, such
as
hydrogen, but to use the energy to produce an intermediate stage may be
a
more practical approach.
A chemical disassociation system could be even less energy efficient
than
electrolysis, but could be easily and safely distributed, perhaps in a
cartridge form.
The point is that both effectiveness and efficiency have to be
considered.

Is anyone able to put some figures on the potential cost efficiency of a
chemical dissociation system at the point of use, versus the bulk
production and distribution of hydrogen, as promoted by our beloved
leaders?

And how would the bulk and weight versus range of a water dissociating
car
system likely to compare with bulk hydrogen, or batteries?
Hydrogen for transport is a non-starter.
Splitting water, 80% efficient.
Fuel cell to electricity, 60% in
practicehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_cell#Fuel_cell_efficiency



Batteries, 90%+http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithium_ion_battery
--
Dirk
http://www.transcendence.me.uk/-Transcendence UK
Remote Viewing classes in London- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The efficiency figures need further description. For example,
conversion of the chemical energy in gasoline to motion of a car
against friction is only about 20%. So 60% sounds pretty good. But
I'll bet that is not the process with 60% efficiency.

Ben

The thing about batteries is not their efficiency or capacity, but their
cost, and that as with explosives, the energy is all together in one place.
More so with super capacitors. A 30KWH battery is more dangerous than a
tankfull of petrol, which needs air to burn. A capacitor with that much
energy would be a bomb! (remember the SF "Interociters"?)

Efficiency may take second place to something that works.

All the best
Ian Macmillan

It is correct that issue is cost. Technically electric car batteries
are already
sufficient (as demonstrated by plug-in Prius conversions or recent
Tesla roadster).
But cost is _even more_ a problem with Fuel Cells. This should be
obvious considering
massive amount of Pt etc catalyst needed to adsorb oxigen from the
air, complexity
of overall system (pumps, fans, condensers, water management, hydrogen
storage or
catalytic conversion etc).
The fact that fuel cells are extremely expensive
is hidden because there are no practical fuel cells available to
purchase!
Try "pricegrabber" - you will find only books.
With advanced batteries, you can go and purchase them, 18650 Li-ion
with 3.7V average and 2.2Ah in bulk for 2$/cell - about 4 Wh/dollar.
Looking for price per power - this cell is rated for continuous
discharge
at 1h rate (full discharge in 1hr), so about 8W per cell, 4W/dollar.

Which is $250 per kWh?
Seems pretty cheap to me. Maybe stacking a whole load like in the Tesla would be the answer for solar PV at night.

--
Dirk

http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK
Remote Viewing classes in London
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: attn: William Mook - How is your company doing?
    ... First - the errors about efficiency. ... That's why people are excited by fuel cells. ... Here is what the Assistant Secretary of Energy Efficiency and Renewable ... so at $0.05 per kWh and 13% overall efficiency this means that we ...
    (sci.energy.hydrogen)
  • Re: Fuel Cell Efficiency in automotive applications
    ... about fuel cell efficiency and the last references ... mechanical energy, not electrical, to move it and this is where the ... vehicle-the electronic inverter, motor, air compressor (fuel cells needs ... 40-percent efficiency at converting methanol to electricity, ...
    (sci.energy.hydrogen)
  • Fuel Cell Efficiency in automotive applications
    ... about fuel cell efficiency and the last references ... mechanical energy, not electrical, to move it and this is where the ... vehicle-the electronic inverter, motor, air compressor (fuel cells needs ... efficiency converting electricity to mechanical power. ...
    (sci.energy.hydrogen)
  • Re: OT: Re: Tow cars and trailers
    ... It can be made from biomass at better net energy yeld than ethanol. ... with fuel cell efficiency the overall efficiency is around 66%. ... The proof of this is that direct drive (no storage) solar electric ...
    (rec.aviation.soaring)
  • Re: attn: William Mook - How is your company doing?
    ... > achieve similar efficiencies in converting electricity and water into ... > with 1.0000 kWh of energy at the end of the process. ... Are you referring to this efficiency comment: "Fuel cells can obtain ...
    (sci.energy.hydrogen)
Quantcast