Re: True Grit and Salsa Verite

From: Lester Zick (lesterDELzick_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 07/07/04 

Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 18:24:34 GMT

On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 16:48:41 +0100, David Longley
<David@longley.demon.co.uk> in comp.ai.philosophy wrote:

>In article <40ec0f7d.63907333@netnews.att.net>, Lester Zick
><lesterDELzick@worldnet.att.net> writes
>>On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 22:58:07 +0100, David Longley
>><David@longley.demon.co.uk> in comp.ai.philosophy wrote:
>>
>>>In article <40eb120e.60978511@netnews.att.net>, Lester Zick
>>><lesterDELzick@worldnet.att.net> writes
>>>>On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 19:29:19 -0400, Wolf Kirchmeir
>>>><wwolfkir@sympatico.ca> in comp.ai.philosophy wrote:
>>>>

[. . .]

>>>>Having checked online resources, Wolf, I agree that the Sheffer
>>>>(Scheffer?) stroke is an important insight that I was not aware of.
>>>
>>>This is not true. This has been explained to you *several* times since
>>>you first started this talk about differences. To cite a few:
>>
>>It has been mentioned several times, David. It has never been
>>explained. You don't explain things.
>>
>
>Quite a lot's been "explained" to you, in many ways, by many people. To
>date, none of that has had any noticeable effect on your bizarre verbal
>behaviour. One thing that's been "explained" to you is that you have a
>serious problem benefiting from what others tell you. The explanation
>for that is that you don't act on the instructions given to you by those
>more skilled than you. That is, you don't do what you are told, so
>there's no outcome for you to benefit from. Like other 'idiots' here,
>you take offence at being told that you don't know what you're writing
>about, and rather than change that behaviour, you repeat it. Your
>(verbal) behaviour is pathological.

I don't take offence, David. Nor do I take orders.

>You require formal education, and very possibly, therapy. You are
>"deluded".

Of course, I'm deluded, David. Just not quite as deluded as you, Glen,
and John H.

>>>
>>>As I said in other posts, you don't read/retain what people write.
>>
>>I read and retain things people write, David. I have retained what you
>>write. That I don't follow through on what you is strictly a function
>>of your lack of insight and credibility. I tend to pay attention to
>>what Wolf cites because he has given important references in the past
>>actually relevant to what I am concerned with. You haven't.
>>
>>Regards - Lester
>>
>
>We'll see, won't we!

We have already seen, David. Your future is way behind you.

Regards - Lester

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The BBC gets it wrong again
    ... As the law was changed in 2003 David then it is NOT indecent to be ... This new offence will, continue to be known by the same ...
    (uk.rec.naturist)
  • Re: "Ploughboying" (?wassail)
    ... > David G. Bell wrote: ... >>>offence within the Larceny Act which was repealed by the Theft Act 1968. ...
    (uk.business.agriculture)
  • Re: One Small Step For Man - One Giant Leap For Naturists
    ... Pardon? ... It wasnt aimed at you David, apologies for the offence you took, it was ...
    (uk.rec.naturist)
  • Re: True Grit and Salsa Verite
    ... David Longley wrote: ... >> I don't take offence, David. ... > that language refer to discriminations and relations made within ...
    (sci.cognitive)
  • Re: 500 Crit Limit: -- Why?
    ... writers to go over your manuscript with a microscope. ... your writing so engaging that they will clamor for permission to do so ... I gave David Friedman as an example. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.composition)