Re: Aaron Sloman's "The Irrelevance of Turing Machines to AI" article
From: Neil W Rickert (rickert+nn_at_cs.niu.edu)
Date: 07/29/04
- Next message: David Longley: "Re: Aaron Sloman's "The Irrelevance of Turing Machines to AI" article"
- Previous message: Lester Zick: "Re: R&M's "memory illusions" and functional verbal response classes"
- In reply to: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Aaron Sloman's "The Irrelevance of Turing Machines to AI" article"
- Next in thread: David Longley: "Re: Aaron Sloman's "The Irrelevance of Turing Machines to AI" article"
- Reply: David Longley: "Re: Aaron Sloman's "The Irrelevance of Turing Machines to AI" article"
- Reply: Sergio Navega: "Re: Aaron Sloman's "The Irrelevance of Turing Machines to AI" article"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:34:56 +0000 (UTC)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Wolf Kirchmeir <wwolfkir@sympatico.ca> writes:
>Eray Ozkural exa wrote:
>...snip...
>> How else could we devise a general computational theory of learning?
>> Would we be talking about particular electronic switches, circuits,
>> network links, and so forth? That does not sound sensible.
>Insoifar as I can understand what you're saying, you seem to be claiming
>that it's possible to have a theory of learning without worrying about
>the underlying physical mechanisms.
That seems a reasonable view to me.
> If so, that would mean that this
>theory describes learning in terms of what, exactly? Software? The
>functioning of the system as a whole?
A computationalist such as Eray is likely to want a description in
terms of software. I would look for one in terms of the functioning
of the system as a whole.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.3.6 (SunOS)
iD8DBQFBCYmdvmGe70vHPUMRAmPaAKCPCeMoY7Yhbl3mD3rKOkMFydo0ZQCgpwr0
G4oiNBwXEMAftuQm/63Le4U=
=4qLw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Next message: David Longley: "Re: Aaron Sloman's "The Irrelevance of Turing Machines to AI" article"
- Previous message: Lester Zick: "Re: R&M's "memory illusions" and functional verbal response classes"
- In reply to: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Aaron Sloman's "The Irrelevance of Turing Machines to AI" article"
- Next in thread: David Longley: "Re: Aaron Sloman's "The Irrelevance of Turing Machines to AI" article"
- Reply: David Longley: "Re: Aaron Sloman's "The Irrelevance of Turing Machines to AI" article"
- Reply: Sergio Navega: "Re: Aaron Sloman's "The Irrelevance of Turing Machines to AI" article"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|