Re: death of the mind.
From: Glen M. Sizemore (gmsizemore2_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 08/03/04
- Next message: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Aaron Sloman's "The Irrelevance of Turing Machines to AI" article"
- Previous message: Wordsmith: "Re: When I enter a room."
- In reply to: patty: "Re: death of the mind."
- Next in thread: dan michaels: "Re: death of the mind."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 3 Aug 2004 03:52:56 -0700
An elaboration of what you are describing can be used to prove
Goedelian Incompleteness.
patty <pattyNO@SPAMicyberspace.net> wrote in message news:<zGwPc.202255$IQ4.35889@attbi_s02>...
> Lester Zick wrote:
>
> >
> > It would include the same people who understand contradiction and self
> > contradiction and the difference between them which apparently doesn't
> > include you.
> >
>
> Here is a twister for a Monday afternoon, consider the following sentence:
>
> "If this sentence is true, then it is false;
> if this sentence is false, then it is true."
>
> Now i claim there is nothing wrong (or self contradictory) with that
> sentence, it merely blinks back and forth between true and false as one
> considers its veracity.
>
> patty
- Next message: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Aaron Sloman's "The Irrelevance of Turing Machines to AI" article"
- Previous message: Wordsmith: "Re: When I enter a room."
- In reply to: patty: "Re: death of the mind."
- Next in thread: dan michaels: "Re: death of the mind."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
