Re: the liver and the brain
From: Lester Zick (lesterDELzick_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 08/31/04
- Next message: patty: "Re: death of the mind."
- Previous message: r norman: "Re: the liver and the brain"
- Maybe in reply to: James Michael Howard: "Re: the liver and the brain"
- Next in thread: David Longley: "Re: the liver and the brain"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 16:11:44 GMT
On 30 Aug 2004 16:14:59 -0700, rscanlon@nycap.rr.com (ray scanlon) in
comp.ai.philosophy wrote:
>I find it interesting that we can have a discussion of how the cells
>in the liver work together without any bitter attacks on a persons
>parentage. But when a similar discussion on how the interneurons are
>connected and how they work is broached there is nothing but
>invective.
>
>What is wrong?
Good question. Because a group of psychotic materialists insist on
engaging in intensionalist fables instead of science to explain the
mind and mental effects.
Regards - Lester
- Next message: patty: "Re: death of the mind."
- Previous message: r norman: "Re: the liver and the brain"
- Maybe in reply to: James Michael Howard: "Re: the liver and the brain"
- Next in thread: David Longley: "Re: the liver and the brain"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
