Re: the liver and the brain
From: ZZBunker (zzbunker_at_netscape.net)
Date: 09/04/04
- Next message: r norman: "Re: the liver and the brain"
- Previous message: Lester Zick: "Re: the liver and the brain"
- In reply to: r norman: "Re: the liver and the brain"
- Next in thread: r norman: "Re: the liver and the brain"
- Reply: r norman: "Re: the liver and the brain"
- Reply: dan michaels: "Re: the liver and the brain"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 4 Sep 2004 11:43:59 -0700
r norman <rsn_@_comcast.net> wrote in message news:<prdjj05ns83p7vkntojv256ost5gvklv7r@4ax.com>...
> On 3 Sep 2004 23:11:01 -0700, zzbunker@netscape.net (ZZBunker) wrote:
>
> >r norman <rsn_@_comcast.net> wrote in message news:<jrohj09c5s7pl63r904cqlmdgn2hkh1v7e@4ax.com>...
>
> >
> > And of course "biologists" still don't believe that
> > physics includes a little bit of math (among other notions).
>
> Worse. Biologists know all too well that physics requires math, that
> is why they avoid it like the plague. The problem is that too many
> biologists still don't believe that biology includes a little bit of
> math.
Biology obviously requires zero math, since Biology
is nothing but a bunch of dim-lightbulb, zero-IQ,
Scientists, Lawyers, Philosophers, and trees.
It's only the the Wright Brothers that
require an intensive quantity of Mathematics.
- Next message: r norman: "Re: the liver and the brain"
- Previous message: Lester Zick: "Re: the liver and the brain"
- In reply to: r norman: "Re: the liver and the brain"
- Next in thread: r norman: "Re: the liver and the brain"
- Reply: r norman: "Re: the liver and the brain"
- Reply: dan michaels: "Re: the liver and the brain"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|