Re: the liver and the brain
From: Lester Zick (lesterDELzick_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 09/07/04
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: First Causes"
- Previous message: Rick Craik: "Re: Neural netss (was Re: death of the mind.)"
- Maybe in reply to: James Michael Howard: "Re: the liver and the brain"
- Next in thread: David Longley: "Re: the liver and the brain"
- Reply: David Longley: "Re: the liver and the brain"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 15:54:09 GMT
On Mon, 6 Sep 2004 20:33:44 +0100, David Longley
<David@longley.demon.co.uk> in comp.ai.philosophy wrote:
[. . .]
>As I recently remarked in reference to Zick's similar nonsense, this is
>an illustration of "intensional opacity" par excellence, and it's why
>I've made so much of it here in c.a.p. (and at times actively
>cross-posted to bionet.neuroscience and sci.cognitive to draw further
>attention to the matter).
Actually, David, all you and Glen have done is behave like a pair of
braying jackasses uttering astonishment that others treat you with
contempt. It's no wonder it took you thirty years to realize that the
only talent you offered behavioral science was as beasts of burden.
Regards - Lester
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: First Causes"
- Previous message: Rick Craik: "Re: Neural netss (was Re: death of the mind.)"
- Maybe in reply to: James Michael Howard: "Re: the liver and the brain"
- Next in thread: David Longley: "Re: the liver and the brain"
- Reply: David Longley: "Re: the liver and the brain"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
