Re: Challenge to the behaviourists #2

From: JPL Verhey (matterDELminds_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/10/04 

Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 14:02:26 +0200

"Glen M. Sizemore" <gmsizemore2@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:6e2f1d09.0409100317.2d5bf771@posting.google.com...
> C'mon Vern, this is just that simplistic conditioning stuff and a few
> drug effects on simplistic conditioning stuff. Why, with your
> sophisticated knowledge of the really complex stuff, this should be a
> breeze.

So I must assume that the behaviorist elite needed perform all those
experiments to find out, just because they are too stupid to predict the
obvious right away. Maybe that's why their status has declined ever
since. But I'm interested in the results of those particular pigeoneqsue
experiments and their conclusions.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Challenge to the behaviourists #2
    ... >> C'mon Vern, this is just that simplistic conditioning stuff and a few ... >> drug effects on simplistic conditioning stuff. ... attribution the terms "stupid" and "intelligent". ...
    (sci.cognitive)
  • Re: Challenge to the behaviourists #2
    ... this is just that simplistic conditioning stuff and a few ... > drug effects on simplistic conditioning stuff. ... the scant attention paid by many to behaviorism is very much ... What are the outcomes, and how would you predict them? ...
    (sci.cognitive)