Re: Challenge to the behaviourists, #1
From: Daryl McCullough (daryl_at_atc-nycorp.com)
Date: 09/13/04
- Next message: Daryl McCullough: "Re: Challenge to the behaviourists, #1"
- Previous message: Daryl McCullough: "Re: Challenge to the behaviourists, #1"
- In reply to: David Longley: "Re: Challenge to the behaviourists, #1"
- Next in thread: David Longley: "Re: Challenge to the behaviourists, #1"
- Reply: David Longley: "Re: Challenge to the behaviourists, #1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 13 Sep 2004 06:18:03 -0700
David Longley says...
>Allan C Cybulskie <allan.c.cybulskie@yahoo.ca> writes
>>Then you should have been able to answer the question: "How does one
>>determine under the behaviourist notion whether a behaviour is intelligent
>>or not?"
>>
>
>There's no *then* about it at all.
>
>Once again you rather tiresomely show that you haven't understood what's
>been written, ie what it refers to (and you haven't questioned your
>assumptions either).
He asked a simple question. Why can't you answer it?
-- Daryl McCullough Ithaca, NY
- Next message: Daryl McCullough: "Re: Challenge to the behaviourists, #1"
- Previous message: Daryl McCullough: "Re: Challenge to the behaviourists, #1"
- In reply to: David Longley: "Re: Challenge to the behaviourists, #1"
- Next in thread: David Longley: "Re: Challenge to the behaviourists, #1"
- Reply: David Longley: "Re: Challenge to the behaviourists, #1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]