Re: Neural netss (was Re: death of the mind.)
From: Eray Ozkural exa (erayo_at_bilkent.edu.tr)
Date: 09/23/04
- Previous message: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Neural netss (was Re: death of the mind.)"
- In reply to: dan michaels: "Re: Neural netss (was Re: death of the mind.)"
- Next in thread: Sergio Navega: "Re: Neural netss (was Re: death of the mind.)"
- Reply: Sergio Navega: "Re: Neural netss (was Re: death of the mind.)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 22 Sep 2004 18:19:49 -0700
feedbackdroids@yahoo.com (dan michaels) wrote in message news:<8d8494cf.0409201451.4732472c@posting.google.com>...
> The question is, for brain studies, do you need to go all the way to
> describing the actions of individual biomolecules?
We might have to. We don't know yet. We only hope that is not the
case, but the brain surely works at a molecular level. The information
theoretic approaches try to abstract away from the chemistry, and
that's how brain operation should be modelled, e.g. at the level of
bits.
Regards,
-- Eray Ozkural
- Previous message: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Neural netss (was Re: death of the mind.)"
- In reply to: dan michaels: "Re: Neural netss (was Re: death of the mind.)"
- Next in thread: Sergio Navega: "Re: Neural netss (was Re: death of the mind.)"
- Reply: Sergio Navega: "Re: Neural netss (was Re: death of the mind.)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]