Re: Neural netss (was Re: death of the mind.)

From: JPL Verhey (matterDELminds_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/24/04 

Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 02:07:36 +0200

"David Longley" <David@longley.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:YaBtZbKTAwUBFwcd@longley.demon.co.uk...
> In article <8d8494cf.0409230829.105885ad@posting.google.com>, dan
> michaels <feedbackdroids@yahoo.com> writes
>>This self-destructive ignorance is a popular disorder which I
>>> suspect is just becoming more salient as the net and our educational
>>> systems become more democratized.
>>
>>
>>Awww ..............
>>
>>Ok, you get one more response this cycle. Take the challenge .....
>>
>>Go form a forum on behaviorism, and see how many scientists come
>>rushing into the fold. I should guess the answer is the 2 twins.
>>Boring.
>>
>>Who will not rush into the fold ??? .... Bateson, Dennett, Humphries,
>>Adler, Bertallanfy, Edelman, Ashby, Wiener, Deacon, Sacks, Piaget,
>>Zeki, van Essen, Kosslyn, Dawkins, Gould, Crick, Maturana, Varela,
>>C.Rogers, S.Greenfield, Searle, Gelernter, Gazza***, Ornstein,
>>Pinker, the Premacks, Wm Calvin, Arvid Carlsson, B.Russell. On and on.
>>These are the people I have read in the past year. And some of them
>>actually graduated from grad school.
>>
>>Now ask me which group of nutcases I'd rather be with. Your group of
>>nutcases or that group of nutcases? DOH!
>
> I don't think anybody really cares what group you'd rather be in. The
> entire way you approach these matters is what's wrong with you.
>
>>
>>Take the challenge. Form your own forum. Don't be such a big silly
>>coward.
>
> I don't think anyone really cares what you've (mis)read over the past
> year either. It's quite clear that you don't understand what you read
> and that what you post doesn't make any sense as a consequence. You
> aren't able to make sound, reliable judgements about these matters
> because you don't have the appropriate background to critically
> evaluate what you read. You just believe what you *like*. This makes
> you extremely irrational/deluded.
>
> Being abusive won't change the truth of that. Sadly, if you carry on
> behaving this way, it may turn out that nothing will.

But we appreciate your efforts to save our lost souls... Lord David. You
truly are a caring personality.

Quantcast