Re: Challenge to the behaviourists, #1

From: Lester Zick (lesterDELzick_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 09/24/04 

Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 18:21:16 GMT

On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 01:34:13 +0100, David Longley
<David@longley.demon.co.uk> in comp.ai.philosophy wrote:

>In article <1095972077.yJLUt/3yxWF0qTtgFG5PVg@teranews>, AlphaOmega2004
><OmegaZero2003@yahoo.com> writes
>>
>>"Lester Zick" <lesterDELzick@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
>>news:41532f2c.44406415@netnews.att.net...
>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 14:19:24 -0400, Wolf Kirchmeir
>>> <wwolfkir@sympatico.ca> in comp.ai.philosophy wrote:

>>> >Since "being viscous" and "possessing viscosity" are merely synonyms for
>>> >"flowing slowly" (more precsiely, "at a certain rate"), those phrases
>>> >don't label or refer to any reasons for flowing slowly.
>>>
>>> You're an idiot, Wolf. There are lots of reasons for flowing slowly
>>
>>Indeed; it could be the coefficient of friction of the surface upon/across
>>which the liquid is flowing. It could be headwind. It could be physical
>>obstacles etc.
>
>Do yourself a favour - try to learn from your mistakes. Better still,
>try to learn from Zick's mistakes.

Which are?

Regards - Lester

Quantcast