Re: Neural netss (was Re: death of the mind.)
From: Lester Zick (lesterDELzick_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 09/26/04
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Neural netss (was Re: death of the mind.)"
- Previous message: JPL Verhey: "Re: Intelligence and Statistics"
- In reply to: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Neural netss (was Re: death of the mind.)"
- Next in thread: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Neural netss (was Re: death of the mind.)"
- Reply: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Neural netss (was Re: death of the mind.)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 15:20:10 GMT
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 18:38:58 -0400, Wolf Kirchmeir
<wwolfkir@sympatico.ca> in comp.ai.philosophy wrote:
>When I ask you what you mean by some term, I usally intend "What are you
>referring to?"
>
>So: what do you mean "self contradiction"?
No, Wolf, you aren't pulling this *** on me. I raised the issue to
find out what behaviorism's doctrine is on the subject and its origin
and impact on behavior, not what mine is. I know what mine is. Self
contradiction is probably the oldest standard of truth in the history
of science. If you don't know what it means either behaviorism has no
doctrine on the mechanical origin of the effect or you don't know what
it is. In either case, you're not competent to discuss it.
Regards - Lester
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Neural netss (was Re: death of the mind.)"
- Previous message: JPL Verhey: "Re: Intelligence and Statistics"
- In reply to: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Neural netss (was Re: death of the mind.)"
- Next in thread: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Neural netss (was Re: death of the mind.)"
- Reply: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Neural netss (was Re: death of the mind.)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]