Re: Neural netss (was Re: death of the mind.)

From: Wolf Kirchmeir (wwolfkir_at_sympatico.ca)
Date: 09/27/04

  • Next message: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Neural netss (was Re: death of the mind.)" 
    Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 23:06:00 -0400

    Lester Zick wrote:
    > On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 11:42:10 -0400, Wolf Kirchmeir
    > <wwolfkir@sympatico.ca> in comp.ai.philosophy wrote:
    >
    >
    >>Lester Zick wrote:
    >>
    >>>On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 18:38:58 -0400, Wolf Kirchmeir
    >>><wwolfkir@sympatico.ca> in comp.ai.philosophy wrote:
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>>When I ask you what you mean by some term, I usally intend "What are you
    >>>>referring to?"
    >>>>
    >>>>So: what do you mean "self contradiction"?
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>No, Wolf, you aren't pulling this *** on me. I raised the issue to
    >>>find out what behaviorism's doctrine is on the subject and its origin
    >>>and impact on behavior, not what mine is. I know what mine is. Self
    >>>contradiction is probably the oldest standard of truth in the history
    >>>of science. If you don't know what it means either behaviorism has no
    >>>doctrine on the mechanical origin of the effect or you don't know what
    >>>it is. In either case, you're not competent to discuss it.
    >>>
    >>>Regards - Lester
    >>
    >>I know what "self-contradiction" means in normal discourse. I don't know
    >>what _you_ mean by it, is all.
    >
    >
    > Well, if you knew what the term means in behaviorist discourse, you
    > could answer the question out of hand.
    >
    > Regards - Lester

    I did.

  • Next message: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Neural netss (was Re: death of the mind.)"
    • Quantcast