Re: Intelligence and Statistics

From: David Longley (David_at_longley.demon.co.uk)
Date: 09/28/04 

Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:19:38 +0100

In article <1096402382.aXi1fHLEtvvqB2X6yLt86w@teranews>, AlphaOmega2004
<OmegaZero2003@yahoo.com> writes
>
>Longley, shut the *** up already you idiot. We neuroscientists KNOW what
>we mean by your so-called "folk-psychological" terms. You do not, or thinbk
>they are terms that are intensional and therefore are inappropriate to the
>task, because you do not know anything about this science.

Your skills and knowledge in neuroscience are as extensive as Zick's in
philosophy.

>Nor do you know
>anything about AI. What are you doing on this forum? We tell you over and
>over that you are a fool and an idiot but you do not listen. Please go gain
>some knowledge about this field. <sigh>

What you think you know about "AI" is, like many in this newsgroup and
elsewhere, conditioned by the movies you see and the other works of
science fiction that you've read. You, like they, can't tell the
difference between that, and what the real science and technology of
behaviour has produced. That's the price you all pay for your idiocy. 

-- 
David Longley
Quantcast