Re: Intelligence and Statistics
From: Lester Zick (lesterDELzick_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 09/29/04
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: The Identity Theory of Mind"
- Previous message: dan michaels: "Re: Some brain questions i need help with"
- In reply to: David Longley: "Re: Intelligence and Statistics"
- Next in thread: David Longley: "Re: Intelligence and Statistics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:46:59 GMT
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:19:38 +0100, David Longley
<David@longley.demon.co.uk> in comp.ai.philosophy wrote:
>In article <1096402382.aXi1fHLEtvvqB2X6yLt86w@teranews>, AlphaOmega2004
><OmegaZero2003@yahoo.com> writes
>>
>>Longley, shut the *** up already you idiot. We neuroscientists KNOW what
>>we mean by your so-called "folk-psychological" terms. You do not, or thinbk
>>they are terms that are intensional and therefore are inappropriate to the
>>task, because you do not know anything about this science.
>
>Your skills and knowledge in neuroscience are as extensive as Zick's in
>philosophy.
David prefers not to use variables in equations. It makes solutions so
much easier.
Regards - Lester
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: The Identity Theory of Mind"
- Previous message: dan michaels: "Re: Some brain questions i need help with"
- In reply to: David Longley: "Re: Intelligence and Statistics"
- Next in thread: David Longley: "Re: Intelligence and Statistics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]