Re: Hawkins ideas on building AI's
From: David Longley (David_at_longley.demon.co.uk)
Date: 10/23/04
- Next message: Curt Welch: "Re: The Hard Problem for Behaviorists"
- Previous message: David Longley: "Re: Hawkins ideas on building AI's"
- In reply to: dan michaels: "Re: Hawkins ideas on building AI's"
- Next in thread: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Hawkins ideas on building AI's"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 01:51:18 +0100
In article <8d8494cf.0410221153.477cbc86@posting.google.com>, dan
michaels <feedbackdroids@yahoo.com> writes
>I think this is what Hawkins is getting at with the memory-expectation
>bit.
Where did Hawkins get his "ideas" from and why does that matter? Where
did Dennett get his "ideas" from and why does that matter? Do you have
any idea why people cite references in *science* and why that is so
important? Do you realise why Hawkins and Dennett don't matter?
Of course you don't. That's why you write such nonsense and why you miss
all the important points that you've been told.
You treat this newsgroup like a celebrity gossip column and your
celebrities are all wanabees. Haven't you realised yet that most folk
who really have something to say eschew celebrity status? They find it
contemptible for all the reasons that have been given ad nauseam!
-- David Longley http://www.longley.demon.co.uk
- Next message: Curt Welch: "Re: The Hard Problem for Behaviorists"
- Previous message: David Longley: "Re: Hawkins ideas on building AI's"
- In reply to: dan michaels: "Re: Hawkins ideas on building AI's"
- Next in thread: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Hawkins ideas on building AI's"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
