Re: Hawkins ideas on building AI's
From: Eray Ozkural exa (examachine_at_gmail.com)
Date: 10/28/04
- Next message: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Antonio Damacio"
- Previous message: Bill Modlin: "Re: Finding useful functions- part 1"
- In reply to: bkaz: "Re: Hawkins ideas on building AI's"
- Next in thread: bkaz: "Re: Hawkins ideas on building AI's"
- Reply: bkaz: "Re: Hawkins ideas on building AI's"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 28 Oct 2004 03:50:15 -0700
bkaz_@hotmail.com (bkaz) wrote in message news:<def186b4.0410272023.216dc6c1@posting.google.com>...
> > I could find many legitimate examples for the concepts of pattern and
> > feature that do not fit into any limited framework. One definition of
> > the mind is that it breaks away from our shallow definitions.
>
> Mine isn't.
Well, I think almost all of our definitions about the mind are
shallow.
The part in your definition that may be problematic is the "tabular"
view it seems to enforce like in classical machine learning. It seems
general enough, right, but it does leave out some valid questions.
What is a variable in a matching input of a pattern?
How is it compared?
Why parallel? (What does parallelism have to do with this?)
Regards,
-- Eray Ozkural
- Next message: Wolf Kirchmeir: "Re: Antonio Damacio"
- Previous message: Bill Modlin: "Re: Finding useful functions- part 1"
- In reply to: bkaz: "Re: Hawkins ideas on building AI's"
- Next in thread: bkaz: "Re: Hawkins ideas on building AI's"
- Reply: bkaz: "Re: Hawkins ideas on building AI's"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|