Re: Tautologies and Empirical Truth
From: The Sophist (sophist_at_brown.edu)
Date: 10/29/04
- Next message: Glen M. Sizemore: "Re: Bareknuckles Behaviorism"
- Previous message: patty: "Re: Tautologies and Empirical Truth"
- Maybe in reply to: Lester Zick: "Tautologies and Empirical Truth"
- Next in thread: patty: "Re: Tautologies and Empirical Truth"
- Reply: patty: "Re: Tautologies and Empirical Truth"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Tautologies and Empirical Truth"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 06:46:19 -0400
Twex wrote:
> Perhaps there is a paradox to muse over here:
>
> The very statement, 'There are no Universal Truths', Which I tend to
> agree with, would itself be the ONLY Universal truth...
That would be why I would find "we can't know that there are any
universal truths" preferable. That could be universally true without
contradiction.
-- Aaron Boyden The main division between the so-called Continental and Analytic traditions has been disputes over whether the task of being unclear should be carried out in natural language or in a formal system.
- Next message: Glen M. Sizemore: "Re: Bareknuckles Behaviorism"
- Previous message: patty: "Re: Tautologies and Empirical Truth"
- Maybe in reply to: Lester Zick: "Tautologies and Empirical Truth"
- Next in thread: patty: "Re: Tautologies and Empirical Truth"
- Reply: patty: "Re: Tautologies and Empirical Truth"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Tautologies and Empirical Truth"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]