Re: Finding useful functions- part 1

From: David Longley (David_at_longley.demon.co.uk)
Date: 11/02/04 

Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 19:24:32 +0000

In article <v8Ohd.46889$R05.27839@attbi_s53>, patty
<pattyNO@SPAMicyberspace.net> writes
>
>I think we are on the same wavelength here :) The conceptual
>definitions for things like life, intelligence, free will, etc are
>particularly vulnerable to choices of the frame of reference.
>
>patty

In other words, such talk is irrelevant and just bosh.

A variant might be hoping one is "on the same wavelength" with someone
regarding whether chocolate vs. blue-berry muffins are "nice" - perhaps
as a prelude to getting into each others pants!

Why else would people such as yourself and starstruck utter such asinine
rubbish? You're doing nothing different from guys who talk about "the
game" or valley-gals who talk "whatever". All you're doing is using a
different *medium*, and that's because you basically don't know how to
talk *rationally* (scientifically). 

-- 
David Longley

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Petersons Death Sentence
    ... >>If time and space are discrete, how can color (wavelength) not be? ... pro-abortion types siezed on this as an argument that there is a continuum ... While I agree with your premiss that life begins at conception, ...
    (comp.os.linux.networking)
  • Re: Petersons Death Sentence
    ... >>If time and space are discrete, how can color (wavelength) not be? ... pro-abortion types siezed on this as an argument that there is a continuum ... While I agree with your premiss that life begins at conception, ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
Quantcast