Re: Finding useful functions- part 1
From: JPL Verhey (matterDELminds_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 11/07/04
- Next message: David Longley: "Re: Finding useful functions- part 1"
- Previous message: Lester Zick: "Re: Finding useful functions- part 1"
- In reply to: Lester Zick: "Re: Finding useful functions- part 1"
- Next in thread: Lester Zick: "Re: Finding useful functions- part 1"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Finding useful functions- part 1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 17:33:29 +0100
"Lester Zick" <lesterDELzick@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:418e38d1.13851315@netnews.att.net...
> On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 19:07:13 +0100, "JPL Verhey"
..
>>> Extensions can't emerge without intensional analysis in some form.
>>> You
>>> may have extensional heurisms but only the extensions are
>>> extensional.
>>> The heurism itself is intensional in this usage of these terms.
>>
>>Isn't it all about the difference between things in the world that are
>>sense-experienced and what we think-about those things following those
>>sense-experiences? Somewhat hard to cut the lines though..
>
> That's the problem, drawing the lines more exactly than we found them.
> The senses are the front line. But then we have to figure out how they
> operate in terms of differences between material differences (that
> expression again) and that principle compounded in terms of itself
> which results in objective or extensional subjects of mechanical
> necessity.
The problem I see is that in fact any experience, from sensed-objects to
any thought process are all equal in their availability to science. All
is as much objective, or subjective for that matter. A vase on a table
is available to science, as are the brain processes that are thought
processes of individuals. The distinction objective/subjective is
therefor false, or rather not different from a statement like the earth
is not the moon.
- Next message: David Longley: "Re: Finding useful functions- part 1"
- Previous message: Lester Zick: "Re: Finding useful functions- part 1"
- In reply to: Lester Zick: "Re: Finding useful functions- part 1"
- Next in thread: Lester Zick: "Re: Finding useful functions- part 1"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Finding useful functions- part 1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|