Re: Darwin, Evolution, the Animal Kingdom, and Man
From: Greg Alexander (galexand_at_ozemail.com.au)
Date: 12/03/04
- Previous message: David Longley: "Re: Darwin, Evolution, the Animal Kingdom, and Man"
- Maybe in reply to: cantueso: "Re: Darwin, Evolution, the Animal Kingdom, and Man"
- Next in thread: Albert: "Re: Darwin, Evolution, the Animal Kingdom, and Man"
- Reply: Albert: "Re: Darwin, Evolution, the Animal Kingdom, and Man"
- Reply: patty: "Re: Darwin, Evolution, the Animal Kingdom, and Man"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Darwin, Evolution, the Animal Kingdom, and Man"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 2 Dec 2004 17:50:02 -0800
Lester Zick (lesterDELzick@worldnet.att.net) wrote:
> Directed evolution isn't the issue. The issue I raised merely concerns
> whether man is categorically different from animals and explanations
> for those differences.
Hi Lester (and others) - my first post here.
An interesting issue with multiple ideas spreading from it, and one
I'd like to learn more about.
There are many things which affect whether an individual or tribe
would breed and survive. Physical strength, fighting, good memory (eg
where food can be found), communicating (eg teaching others how to
survive), giving your life to save the tribe, curiosity (about
multiple sources of water), fear (and knowing multiple routes of
escape), exploring things for no reason (which later prove
life-saving).
All would lead to more success in survival and breeding wouldn't it?
But it doesn't answer why other animals haven't taken the same path in
any way that is apparent to us.
Maybe we survived because some tribes had to find a cause for
everything - and in being driven always to find causes, reasons, they
were able somehow to survive better. We create great mental maps of
our world, we communicate, speculate, all from an earlier survival
mechanism. Maybe we evolved so that we MUST know why things happen,
and we're almost hard-wired to believe everything has some reason and
meaning.
Perhaps at some time in our evolution, we understood enough to know
some things didn't seem to have reasons. It could have been a turning
point in evolution - the NEED to know WHY was blocking us - should it
be:
a) abandoned, or do we
b) create a universal "answer"
If that was the case, did we create a belief in God (or gods), so we
could continue asking "Why?" and evolve mentally.
Other evolving species didn't develop "why" any further, and did
something different. Maybe some other species did nothing, and had
their tribe fall apart and died.
That's a whole lot of guess work and the like! Just one rambling
thought trail in my head.
Greg
- Previous message: David Longley: "Re: Darwin, Evolution, the Animal Kingdom, and Man"
- Maybe in reply to: cantueso: "Re: Darwin, Evolution, the Animal Kingdom, and Man"
- Next in thread: Albert: "Re: Darwin, Evolution, the Animal Kingdom, and Man"
- Reply: Albert: "Re: Darwin, Evolution, the Animal Kingdom, and Man"
- Reply: patty: "Re: Darwin, Evolution, the Animal Kingdom, and Man"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Darwin, Evolution, the Animal Kingdom, and Man"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|