Re: Epistemology 101
From: Uncle Al (UncleAl0_at_hate.spam.net)
Date: 12/27/04
- Next message: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 101"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 101"
- In reply to: Lester Zick: "Epistemology 101"
- Next in thread: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 101"
- Reply: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 101"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 101"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 18:00:16 -0800
Lester Zick wrote:
>
> Epistemology 101
> ----------
>
> (Positivism)
>
> Without any way to decide the truth of empirical observations except
> the absence of self contradiction, one is forced to fall back on the
> idea of utility as the basis of epistemology.If one cannot judge truth
> one must judge value.
[snip]
Zick - are you still stooopid? Here's an easy one for you. Pick one:
1) Zick is correct.
2) The balance of reality is correct.
Choose wisely.
-- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
- Next message: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 101"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 101"
- In reply to: Lester Zick: "Epistemology 101"
- Next in thread: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 101"
- Reply: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 101"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 101"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|