Re: Epistemology 101
From: Neil W Rickert (rickert+nn_at_cs.niu.edu)
Date: 12/28/04
- Next message: John Morrison: "Re: Epistemology 101"
- Previous message: Neil W Rickert: "Re: Epistemology 101"
- In reply to: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 101"
- Next in thread: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 101"
- Reply: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 101"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 02:22:58 +0000 (UTC)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Albert <albertwagner@cox.net> writes:
>Neil W Rickert wrote:
>>>>But what is the basis for "truth"?
>>>I don't understand this question.
>> You have stated the problem quite succinctly. I look forward to
>> your solution.
>Unfortunately, my solution is for you to clarify your statement.
But the question is straightforward.
I'll try to illustrate.
If you build an AI system, that system will have to make judgements
of truth. On what basis will it make those judgements?
>As was pointed out in my previous post, the context was science
>and neither theology nor philosophy.
Make that AI system an AI scientist.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.3.91 (SunOS)
iD8DBQFB0MN+vmGe70vHPUMRAnCoAJ9BRFJcunz/HsYNkXdhpjHTt1oBNwCeJ0PA
oBu+NslkSl4ntaBtEo7VHT8=
=8y3a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Next message: John Morrison: "Re: Epistemology 101"
- Previous message: Neil W Rickert: "Re: Epistemology 101"
- In reply to: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 101"
- Next in thread: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 101"
- Reply: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 101"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
