Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: Albert (albertwagner_at_cox.net)
Date: 01/29/05
- Next message: Milan: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Torkel Franzen: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Torkel Franzen: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Milan: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 11:09:06 -0600
Torkel Franzen wrote:
> Albert <albertwagner@cox.net> writes:
>
>
>>Mathematics is nothing but a language for describing
>>relationships between numbers.
>
>
> In what sense are the theorems of algebra or analysis or topology
> descriptions of relationships between numbers?
Languages have rules. How do you understand 'relationship'?
--
"Don't you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the
range of thought? In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally
impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it."
-- George Orwell as Syme in "1984"
- Next message: Milan: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Torkel Franzen: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Torkel Franzen: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Milan: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|