Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: robert j. kolker (nowhere_at_nowhere.net)
Date: 02/02/05
- Next message: Jason: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 22:38:23 -0500
Albert wrote:
> Ah! Does that include your mysterious non-numerical mathematical objects?
Thingls like groups, transformations, manifolds, symmetries etc etec.
You bet. They are purely abstract and mental.
Bob Kolker
>
>
- Next message: Jason: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
