Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science

From: Richard Herring (junk_at_[127.0.0.1)
Date: 02/02/05 

Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 12:11:05 +0000

In message <42000265.57726689@netnews.att.net>, Lester Zick
<lesterDELzick@worldnet.att.net> writes
>On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 15:24:53 -0500, "robert j. kolker"
><nowhere@nowhere.net> in comp.ai.philosophy wrote:
>
>>Lester Zick wrote:
>
>>> Do you actually read what you write? The reason I concentrate on
>>> your typos is that you can't seem to put sentences, like the last two,
>>> together in any sensible form. I can't even tell who or what you're
>>> talking about. You're pretty much just babbling.
>>
>>I will say it again. You clearly implied that ALL irrational numbers
>>were roots of quadritic equations. It is not so. Most irrational
>>numbers are not algebraic. Got that?
>
>And rational numbers are a subset of irrational numbers

Bzzzt. Spot the deliberate mistake...

>and not a
>subset of transcendental numbers. Got that, sport?
>
>>Learn some math. It will make the discussion go more smoothly.
>
>What conversation? All you do is pontificate ex cathedra.
>
PKB. HTH. HAND. 

-- 
Richard Herring

Relevant Pages