Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: OsherD (mdoctorow_at_comcast.net)
Date: 02/02/05
- Next message: OsherD: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Maybe in reply to: OsherD: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 2 Feb 2005 13:42:19 -0800
>>From Osher Doctorow
Cike,
I can't find you anywhere previously on this thread.
Your question, "Why ramble on and on about what science is?" and your
suggestion of looking the word up in the dictionary to clarify many
points of view leads me to believe that you don't know what the word
"ramble" means and what the word "clarify" means. Perhaps "ramble"
means something in the Hollywood motion picture jargon dictionary other
than its usual meaning in the internet, but if you intend to illustrate
a "fresh" viewpoint by asking someone why they're rambling, do try
using your own advice. I'll wait while you look up "ramble" and
"clarify" in the dictionary, OK? Or perhaps you want to share with us
the meanings of ramble, clarify, and science in the dictionary?
Osher Doctorow
- Next message: OsherD: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Maybe in reply to: OsherD: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]