Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: Albert (albertwagner_at_cox.net)
Date: 02/10/05
- Next message: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 15:29:08 -0600
Tony Orlow (aeo6) wrote:
> robert j. kolker said:
>
>>
>>Albert wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Reality is not based on axioms, but rather physical laws.
>>
>>Physical laws are human artifacts which are used to define the physical
>>world in which we live. Reality just is. There are no laws other than
>>what we prescribe to make sense out of what we perceive and experience.
>>
>>Bob Kolker
>>
>
> So, there are no rules that govern the universe, except in our minds?
> Before people, the universe wasn't consistently behaving according to
> rules that govern the interactions between entities in it? Reality just
> "was" until we started applying math to it? Pretty magical....and
> ridiculous. Why do mathematicians want to own math? It's like saying
> Columbus invented America.
LOL. I love that last sentence. I'll have to remember that.
--
"Don't you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the
range of thought? In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally
impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it."
-- George Orwell as Syme in "1984"
- Next message: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
