Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: aeo6 (aeo6_at_cornell.edu)
Date: 02/14/05
- Next message: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:01:50 -0500
Albert said:
> Tony Orlow (aeo6) wrote:
> > Albert said:
> >
> >>robert j. kolker wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>Tony Orlow (aeo6) wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Let's draw an anology to the mind.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>You mean brain and nervous system don't you? There is no evidence that
> >>>mind as a separate subrance from the physical stuff of which we are
> >>>made, exists. Slice open a human being and you will find bloody goo.
> >>>Where is the mind?
> >>
> >>It is true that mind is not a separate substance. Mind in an
> >>emergent phenomenon dependent on the physical substrate of the
> >>the bloody goo. You destroyed the mind when you killed the goo.
> >
> > I agree. Mind is the function of brain.
>
> I wouldn't say that. The function of brain is much more
> primitive than mind. That's why I say that mind is an emergent
> phenomenon dependent on the physical substrate of brain.
I wouldn't say brain is more primitive than mind. Brains are pretty
damned complex, and I don't believe mind is as complex or mysterious as
many seem to think. Of course that's not an argument anyone can win at
this point. More a matter of opinion.
>
>
>
> > I won't try to defend this
> > position, but I also hold open the possibility that mind may exist
> > independent of a brain, though it doesn't make sense to me at this time.
>
>
>
-- Smiles, Tony
- Next message: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Albert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|