Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: Lester Zick (lesterDELzick_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 02/14/05
- Next message: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:58:05 GMT
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:46:05 -0500, "robert j. kolker"
<nowhere@nowhere.net> in comp.ai.philosophy wrote:
>Tony Orlow (aeo6) wrote:
>
>>
>> Lester - very nice flow there against empiricism. Kind of a poetic feel
>> to it.....
>
>Lester conveniently ignores the fact that the empricists make it
>possible to spew his nonsense all over the internet.
But Lester does not conveniently ignore the fact that even if
"empiricists make it possible to spew his nonsense all over the
internet," empiricism does not, a distinction which escapes
empiricists the world over.
Regards - Lester
- Next message: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|