Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: aeo6 (aeo6_at_cornell.edu)
Date: 03/04/05
- Next message: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 13:32:40 -0500
Albert Wagner said:
> Tony Orlow (aeo6) wrote:
> <snip>
>
> > Someting tells me though, even when you see
> > it in front of you, you'll say it's a trick and dismiss it until it
> > curses you out and puts you in the kill file.
>
> LOL. Pot calling the kettle black.
>
>
>
>
Albert, I have already put your little pillar dance to rest so can it,
please. All I saw in front of me was an irrelevant gedanken based on a
false premise. That WAS a trick, and you got caught, so get over it.
-- Smiles, Tony
- Next message: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|