Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science

From: newedana (simplesong1004_at_hanmail.net)
Date: 03/14/05

  • Next message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science" 
    Date: 13 Mar 2005 19:24:01 -0800

    "....... However, man gradually turned out to be like an animal in
    viewing the nature ever since the first discovery of atomic structure
    by Rutherford, and the electron by Irish physicist G. J. Stoney and
    British physicist J. J. Thomson et al around 1897. They stated that the
    electron was nothing else than a mass particle building atoms of all
    the material system, in respect that its motion obeying projectile
    mechanics. The philosophical implication of their thoughts was
    profound. ............
    These ideologies say that reliable knowledge never comes from a shadowy
    work of human brain, but from real things touchable, visible and
    audible with their sensory organs, since human being is nothing else
    than a kind of animal species evolved from single-cell life happen to
    be emerged on the earth, according to Charles Darwin's evolutional
    doctrine. ......"

    Dr. Hansik Yoon stated in the Preface of his book, "Natural Science
    Founded on A New Atomic Model". You may read the whole Preface from
    http://www.yoonsatom.net
    If you visit the library of University of Chicago, you may read his
    whole book. http://www.lib.uchicago.edu/e/crerar/newbooks/nb0105.html

    Dr. Hansik Yoon continued:

    " ........ Under this philosophical background, there emerged two basic
    physical theories in the beginning of last century. One was the quantum
    mechanical theory initiated by Max Plank, and the other was [a set of]
    two theories of relativity, proposed by Albert Einstein. ....... Both
    are allegedly particle physics based on the philosophy of materialism
    or positivism. In order to describe the nature with their logic of
    particle physics, energy and light that are essentially continuous
    entities in character had to be subdivided into unit particles. These
    particles were called quanta and photon, the smallest ultimate energy
    and light particles, indivisible further into much smaller units.
    However, this postulation was immediately against the natural law.
    ......."

    "...... It was the same idea as that the numerical gap between 1 and 2
    could be filled with the smallest ultimate decimals of infinite
    numbers. It is a trick to persuade people to believe improbable things
    or events as real. If we use this trick, for example, we can readily
    prove that [the length of] two sides of a triangle is equal to the
    third one. ....... However, obviously this is no more a triangle. ...."

    "...... Continuous entities are theoretically [intrinsically]
    impossible to subdivide into final subunits, since they are divisible
    endlessly, and subdivided final products have the same as their initial
    character.
    Energy and light are such entities. Atoms or bio-cells are exceptions,
    because they are impossible to be subdivided into much smaller unit
    particles without sacrificing their initial atomic or cellular
    characters. ........"

    "....... For example, the quantum oscillator, the latest atomic model,
    was built based on this idea of particle physics. The kinetic energy of
    orbital electron orbiting in three dimensional space forming an
    electron cloud cannot balance out theoretically with its potential
    energy. ....... Nevertheless, these two energies of orbital electron
    are unreasonably balanced in the Shrodinger's wave equation. It
    conflicts with a plain truth of physical law. .......
    So the orbital electron of the quantum oscillator cannot perform a real
    oscillation, but only an imaginary oscillation in the mathematical
    equation. ..."

    Dr. Yoon also stated in the preface of his book that

    "....... The magnetism induced by this tiny persistent current
    ring that has allegedly the Meissoner's diamagnetism effect against
    external magnetism governs all the physicochemical phenomena occurring
    in material world. It is not the electric attraction force believed
    from the 17th century up to now. ..............."

    The whole Preface is available at http://www.yoonsatom.net
    If you visit the library of University of Chicago, you may read the
    whole book. http://www.lib.uchicago.edu/e/crerar/newbooks/nb0105.html

  • Next message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
      ... electron was nothing else than a mass particle building atoms of all ... are allegedly particle physics based on the philosophy of materialism ... impossible to subdivide into final subunits, ...
      (sci.physics)
    • Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
      ... electron was nothing else than a mass particle building atoms of all ... are allegedly particle physics based on the philosophy of materialism ... impossible to subdivide into final subunits, ...
      (sci.math)
    • Re: Radiation langauge
      ... The issue - not that I specifically wish to contend the issue in physics, ... records the photon arriving before the other photon which was emitted ... > would exhibit the frequency (particle / wave) nature of the laser light. ... if we could not displace an electron ...
      (alt.usage.english)
    • Physics wrong turns - nearly everything learned over the past 100 years is wrong
      ... What is with the Alice in Wonderland state of physics? ... There is no way this particle exchange can work! ... We are all familiar with the model of the atom as an extremely compact ... from blobs of electron clouds. ...
      (sci.physics)
    • Re: Positron and Electron
      ... mathematics for its description. ... Category: Atomic and Molecular Physics ... discovery of the positron are discussed. ... The positron (as opposed to the electron) is a related, ...
      (sci.physics)