Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (spamtrap_at_library.lspace.org.invalid)
Date: 03/14/05
- Next message: Neil W Rickert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: newedana: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Daryl McCullough: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Daryl McCullough: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Daryl McCullough: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 23:06:00 -0500
In <d0tcnk01c0m@drn.newsguy.com>, on 03/11/2005
at 04:22 PM, stevendaryl3016@yahoo.com (Daryl McCullough) said:
>So it's really only the combination of relativity and quantum
>mechanics that makes hidden variables theories nonviable.
Nobody has ever shown that relativity precludes hidden variables.
Relativity allows[1] for the possibility of tachions, and the path
integral approach to relativistic QED uses[2] spacelike trajectories.
[1] Although currently there is no evidence for them.
[2] That's suggestive rather than definitive, because you can
consider the virtual particles to be artifacts of calculation
rather than physical.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT <http://patriot.net/~shmuel> Unsolicited bulk E-mail subject to legal action. I reserve the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail. Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do not reply to spamtrap@library.lspace.org
- Next message: Neil W Rickert: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: newedana: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Daryl McCullough: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Daryl McCullough: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Daryl McCullough: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|