Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: Albert Wagner (albertwagner_at_cox.net)
Date: 03/17/05
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 18:55:04 -0600
robert j. kolker wrote:
>
> Tony Orlow (aeo6) wrote:
>
>> You didn't answer the question. Is it true that there are an infinite
>> number of natural numbers for every natural number? Is the conclusion
>> correct? Or, is there exactly one natural number for every natural
>> number?
>
> Yes. It is true. I gave a proof.
Oh, come on, Bob. A mathematical proof has nothing whatsoever to
do with truth.
-- "I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be based on the field concept, i. e., on continuous structures. In that case nothing remains of my entire castle in the air, gravitation theory included, [and of] the rest of modern physics." -- Albert Einstein in a 1954 letter to Michele Besso.
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: robert j. kolker: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: aeo6: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
