Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: Lester Zick (lesterDELzick_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 03/21/05
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Maybe in reply to: stephen_at_nomail.com: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:37:58 GMT
On Mon, 21 Mar 05 16:40:06 GMT, jmfbahciv@aol.com in
comp.ai.philosophy wrote:
>In article <3a8em9F66sd5kU1@individual.net>,
> "robert j. kolker" <nowhere@nowhere.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>Richard Herring wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I wouldn't know. What's a "mathematiker"?
>>
>>His mocking term for mathematicians.
>
>Oh, Robert. Let the kid dig his own hole.
Or not.
Regards - Lester
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Maybe in reply to: stephen_at_nomail.com: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|