Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: Giuseppe Bilotta (bilotta78_at_hotpop.com)
Date: 03/22/05
- Next message: stephen_at_nomail.com: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:52:36 +0100
Albert Wagner wrote:
> I consider infinity to be undefined and undefinable.
Or, translated in English "I consider apples to be oranges and
pears."
Enough of this blabbering.
--
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
Can't you see
It all makes perfect sense
Expressed in dollar and cents
Pounds shillings and pence
(Roger Waters)
- Next message: stephen_at_nomail.com: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|