Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science

From: Lester Zick (lesterDELzick_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 03/23/05 

Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 19:05:34 GMT

On 23 Mar 2005 08:55:46 -0800, stevendaryl3016@yahoo.com (Daryl
McCullough) in comp.ai.philosophy wrote:

>Albert Wagner says...
>
>>I tried to warn you not to attempt this, Bob. But you had to try
>>anyway, didn't you? Infinite cannot be defined as an infinite
>>property of anything.
>>
>>In _MIND AND NATURE: A Necessary Unity_ Gregory Bateson describes
>>this faulty logic:
>>---------------------------------------
>>A common form of empty explanation is the appeal to what I have
>>called "dormitive principles", borrowing the word dormitive from
>>Molière. There is a coda in dog Latin to Molière’s Le Malade
>>Imaginaire, and in this coda, we see on the stage a medieval oral
>>doctoral examination. The examiners ask the candidate why opium
>>puts people to sleep. The candidate triumphantly answers,
>>"Because, learned doctors, it contains a dormitive principle."
>
>The definition of "infinite" has nothing in common with
>what Bateson is talking about. There is nothing circular
>about saying
>
> A set S is infinite if there exists a bijection between
> S and a proper subset of S.
>
>Bijection is defined without any mention of infinity. Proper
>subset is defined without any mention of infinity. Therefore,
>defining defining "infinite" in terms of "bijection" and "proper
>subset" is not circular.

It's not so much circular, Daryl, as not a definition. It's just a
list of consequences for infinity when applied to set operations.
It's more an illustration of what infinity means in a particular
instance by list of ostensible consequences.

Regards - Lester

Relevant Pages

  • Re: For ANY sets A, B: If A is proper subset of B then set B hasmo...
    ... Cantor said for any sets A, B, if B is the powerset of A then there ... Also there are models where a proper superset can be considered larger ... Archimedean paradox of potential actual infinity. ... Anyways, in a model of ubiquitous ordinals, the powerset of a set is the ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: For ANY sets A, B: If A is proper subset of B then set B hasmo...
    ... Cantor said for any sets A, B, if B is the powerset of A then there ... Also there are models where a proper superset can be considered larger ... Archimedean paradox of potential actual infinity. ... Anyways, in a model of ubiquitous ordinals, the powerset of a set is the ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
    ... If that is the definition of proper subset, then what it says is that B ... There is no contradiction. ... And I dealt with that by pointing out the mathematical trick that it relies ... infinity, but then we try to get rid of the infinity which is the only thing ...
    (sci.cognitive)
  • Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
    ... If that is the definition of proper subset, then what it says is that B ... There is no contradiction. ... And I dealt with that by pointing out the mathematical trick that it relies ... infinity, but then we try to get rid of the infinity which is the only thing ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
    ... If that is the definition of proper subset, then what it says is that B ... There is no contradiction. ... And I dealt with that by pointing out the mathematical trick that it relies ... infinity, but then we try to get rid of the infinity which is the only thing ...
    (sci.math)
Loading