Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
From: Giuseppe Bilotta (bilotta78_at_hotpop.com)
Date: 03/23/05
- Next message: Giuseppe Bilotta: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 21:49:16 +0100
Lester Zick wrote:
> It's not so much circular, Daryl, as not a definition.
What is a definition?
--
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
Can't you see
It all makes perfect sense
Expressed in dollar and cents
Pounds shillings and pence
(Roger Waters)
- Next message: Giuseppe Bilotta: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|