Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science
stephen_at_nomail.com
Date: 03/23/05
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Giuseppe Bilotta: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 23 Mar 2005 22:31:42 GMT
In sci.math Giuseppe Bilotta <bilotta78@hotpop.com> wrote:
: Lester Zick wrote:
:> The definition for infinity is that it is undefined.
: Statement contradicted by any dictionary.
My dictionary lists 7 definitions for "infinity". Seems
like a strange thing to do for a word that is undefined. Most
of them refer to "infinite". For "infinite" it has
9 definitions, none of which are "undefined". The
closest is
"unbounded or unlimited; perfect : God's infinite mercy"
The 5th definition is:
5. Math. a. not finite. b. (of a set) having elements
that can be put into one-to-one correspondence with a subset
that is not the given set
This is the 1994 "Webster's New Universal Unabridged Dictionary"
Stephen
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- In reply to: Giuseppe Bilotta: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Next in thread: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Albert Wagner: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Reply: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|