Re: How many differences, categories?
From: Immortalist (reanimater_2000_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/25/05
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Just Playing: "Re: How many differences, categories?"
- In reply to: Just Playing: "Re: How many differences, categories?"
- Next in thread: Just Playing: "Re: How many differences, categories?"
- Reply: Just Playing: "Re: How many differences, categories?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 25 Mar 2005 10:39:28 -0800
Just Playing wrote:
> Thank you, I saved it on my computer and I will look at it later.
> OTOH my concern is mostly with the the categorization at the
> conceptual, verbal level.
> It is more like something that could be tested by asking a group to
> describe verbally an image.
> It is a translation from one type of perception, visual, to another,
> verbal and back.
......In a sparse distributed network - memory is a type of
perception.....The act of remembering and the act of perceiving both
detect a pattern in a vary large choice of possible patterns....When we
remember we recreate the act of the original perception - that is we
relocate the pattern by a process similar to the one we used to
perceive the pattern originally.
Kevin Kelly......oUt Of cOnTrOl......page 18---
http://www.kk.org/outofcontrol/ch2-d.html
Somehow human noises initiate similar non-verbal/syntaxic- memories and
experiences. If the act of remembering and the act of perceiving both
detect a pattern in a vary large choice of possible patterns and when
we remember we recreate the act of the original perception - that is we
relocate the pattern by a process similar to the one we used to
perceive the pattern originally, then these noises of language gain
dualistic access to the pathways experience travels and is translatable
into those experience.
--reanimater
transcribe: rewrite or arrange a piece of music for an instrument or
medium other than that originally intended.
http://www.google.com/search?q=define%3Atranscribe
1. To make a full written or typewritten copy of (dictated
material, for example).
2. Computer Science. To transfer (information) from one recording
and storing system to another.
3. Music.
1. To adapt or arrange (a composition) for a voice or
instrument other than the original.
2. To translate (a composition) from one notational system to
another.
3. To reduce (live or recorded music) to notation.
4. To record, usually on tape, for broadcast at a later date.
5. Linguistics. To represent (speech sounds) by phonetic symbols.
6. To translate or transliterate.
7. Biology. To cause (DNA) to undergo transcription.
> If we create a verbal limitation, as in a specified number of words
> for a verbal description, is it possible for another person that has
> not seen the image, to recognize it from the verbal description?
> Do we create new concepts in order to do it?
> How do we describe so many differences with a limited number of
words?
> What is the minimum number of words to create a "perfect
translation"?
>
> Are the words used for description understandbly for somebody else?
>
> JP
- Next message: Lester Zick: "Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science"
- Previous message: Just Playing: "Re: How many differences, categories?"
- In reply to: Just Playing: "Re: How many differences, categories?"
- Next in thread: Just Playing: "Re: How many differences, categories?"
- Reply: Just Playing: "Re: How many differences, categories?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
