Re: Epistemology 201: The Science of Science

From: Lester Zick (lesterDELzick_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 03/25/05 

Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 19:08:47 GMT

On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:33:18 -0500, "robert j. kolker"
<nowhere@nowhere.net> in comp.ai.philosophy wrote:

>Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
 
>> There is no definition of universal in that post.
>
>Agree. I re-read it also.

It does, however, have a definition for always true and always false
that seems to have escaped your parochial grasp of universal truth.

> It has a childs caracture of the law of
>contradiction and the law of the excluded middle. That is the depths of
>its profundity.

And exactly who elected you fucking pope?

Yours in Christ - Lester

Quantcast