Re: Smith and Mill: Georgists?
royls_at_telus.net
Date: 06/05/04
- Next message: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Smith and Mill: Georgists?"
- Previous message: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Smith and Mill: Georgists?"
- In reply to: Robert J. Kolker: "Re: Smith and Mill: Georgists?"
- Next in thread: Robert J. Kolker: "Re: Smith and Mill: Georgists?"
- Reply: Robert J. Kolker: "Re: Smith and Mill: Georgists?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 20:22:51 GMT
On Sat, 05 Jun 2004 11:14:04 GMT, "Robert J. Kolker"
<robert_kolker@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Mark Monson wrote:
>
>> Yes, but that is not what you have been arguing.
>
>Yes it is. Tax is an expense. The money for it comes out of the pocket
>of he who rented the land from the owner.
>
>For that last time (I hope). Out of whose pocket did the money to pay
>the land tax come?
For the last time (I hope):
_Who_actually_ends_up_with_less_money_in_his_pocket_as_a_result_of_the_tax_?
_That's_ who is paying it. If A ends up with no less money in his
pocket after the tax is implemented, but B does, then B is paying the
tax, and A isn't.
I don't know any simpler way to say this.
-- Roy L
- Next message: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Smith and Mill: Georgists?"
- Previous message: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Smith and Mill: Georgists?"
- In reply to: Robert J. Kolker: "Re: Smith and Mill: Georgists?"
- Next in thread: Robert J. Kolker: "Re: Smith and Mill: Georgists?"
- Reply: Robert J. Kolker: "Re: Smith and Mill: Georgists?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|