Re: More on Ecological Economics.
From: Ian St. John (istjohn_at_noemail.ca)
Date: 06/18/04
- Next message: Robert J. Kolker: "Re: More on Ecological Economics."
- Previous message: sinister: "Re: The 'working poor' scam"
- In reply to: Robert J. Kolker: "Re: More on Ecological Economics."
- Next in thread: Robert J. Kolker: "Re: More on Ecological Economics."
- Reply: Robert J. Kolker: "Re: More on Ecological Economics."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 09:17:40 -0400
Robert J. Kolker wrote:
> Albert wrote:
>
>
>> A viable society requires impartiality in application of rational
>> prohibitions, i.e. we can make no distinction between others and
>> ourselves, insofar as the rational prohibitions go; To do
>> otherwise will destroy the society. Therefore a rational person,
>> who desires the benefits of society, will agree to the
>> impartiality.
>
> Who says that society is rational or even needs to be? The strong have
> been abusing the weak for nearly a half million years, yet the human
> race survives. How so? Go figure. If you have a choice between ruling
> and being ruled, then be a ruler. It is better to win than to lose.
>
> Get used to the following -fact of life-. Goodness and mercy,
> compassion and righteousness do not rule the planet. They never have.
> They never will. Learn to live with it.
Thank you Bob, for demonstrating that you are a viscious animal with the
morals of a parasite. It helps us to differentiate humans from your kind.
>
> Bob Kolker
- Next message: Robert J. Kolker: "Re: More on Ecological Economics."
- Previous message: sinister: "Re: The 'working poor' scam"
- In reply to: Robert J. Kolker: "Re: More on Ecological Economics."
- Next in thread: Robert J. Kolker: "Re: More on Ecological Economics."
- Reply: Robert J. Kolker: "Re: More on Ecological Economics."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|