Re: Alternative to Invention Patents
From: Robert J. Kolker (robert_kolker_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 06/18/04
- Next message: John Turmel: "TURMEL: Brantford Chamber of Commerce Survey"
- Previous message: Rue The Day: "Re: Alternative to Invention Patents"
- In reply to: Rue The Day: "Re: Alternative to Invention Patents"
- Next in thread: Rue The Day: "Re: Alternative to Invention Patents"
- Reply: Rue The Day: "Re: Alternative to Invention Patents"
- Reply: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Alternative to Invention Patents"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 18:32:52 GMT
Rue The Day wrote:
> In many ways, I find a system where inventors keep things secret
> preferable to a system where the government enforces an artificial
> patent monopoly. That puts the burden of protecting the invention on
> the inventor rather than on the consumer and the taxpayer.
If the burden of secrecy becomes too high then there will be fewer
inventions. Why bother busting one's ass if he can be ripped off real
quick?
Bob Kolker
- Next message: John Turmel: "TURMEL: Brantford Chamber of Commerce Survey"
- Previous message: Rue The Day: "Re: Alternative to Invention Patents"
- In reply to: Rue The Day: "Re: Alternative to Invention Patents"
- Next in thread: Rue The Day: "Re: Alternative to Invention Patents"
- Reply: Rue The Day: "Re: Alternative to Invention Patents"
- Reply: royls_at_telus.net: "Re: Alternative to Invention Patents"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|