Re: More on Ecological Economics.
From: Robert Vienneau (rvien_at_see.sig.com)
Date: 06/18/04
- Next message: Grinch: "Re: Cheap oil forever!"
- Previous message: Michael Vilkin: "Re: Aggregate debt"
- In reply to: Robert J. Kolker: "Re: More on Ecological Economics."
- Next in thread: Psalm 110: "Re: More on Ecological Economics."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 19:36:56 -0400
---------------------------------------------------------------
Kater Moggin <moggin@attbiTHORN.com> wrote on 5 December 2003:
>> A simple matter of genocide. "Kill all the Muslims" is how
>> you put it before.
Robert J. Kolker <bobkolker@attbi.com>:
> And why, you might ask.
I might. Or I might figure you're a raving homocidal kook.
-- Moggin
---------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew Reeves wrote on 18 April 2002:
> So, if we can establish a kook as one from whom nothing of
> any value...can be learned, the list is as follows:
>
> --...
> --Bob Kolker. Amusing in a grumpy old man sort of way, but
> generally not much to be gleaned...
---------------------------------------------------------------
vonchloride wrote on 16 November 2001:
> "Robert J. Kolker" <bobkolker@mediaone.net> wrote in message
> news:<3BF3BBBB.2E66D557@mediaone.net>...
> > vonchloride wrote:
> >
> > ....delete paranoid ravings....
> >
> > I hear the Black Helicopters coming. (Thwup, Thwup Thwup)
> > I must put on my tinfoil hat before they fire their Mind Control
> > Rays at me.
> >
> > Bob Kolker
>
> Bob, you get called a kook more than anyone else I know of. Over two
> years ago you asked me if I had "been visited by Federal Officials or
> local polizei concerning [my] writings," because I was the only one
> that was taking your side, agreeing with you and saying the same
> things that you were. And you told me then that the reason you asked
> me this was because you had gotten such a visit for your thought
> crimes. I guess now I should have dismissed this as paranoid ravings,
> although I did not at the time.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Tommy Gehring wrote on 22 March 2001:
> >From: "Robert J. Kolker" bobkolker@email.com
> >Tommy Gehring wrote:
> >> Well, Bob, since you've got it ALL figured out, we're just _dying_ to
> >> read your
> >> manifesto when you get it published. And, conincidentally, why do we
> >> have laws,
> >> if we don't need them? Shocking waste of time, if we ask you, i'll
> >> bet.
> >Write your own Manifesto. You have the wits for it.
> >I will give you a hint:
> >
> > What is yours is yours and what is mine is mine.
> Bob, you don't hold any kind of position of responsiblity over other
> people do
> you? God help them if you do....
>
> Besides, I don't need a manifesto, i'm not a kook. Simply tired of people
> like
> yourself who think they're God (or Marx, or Allah, depending)'s gift to
> the
> world. Why do you even bother? I mean, you're not doing anything besides
> pissing people off.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Allan Mac Donald wrote on 14 March 2001:
> "Robert J. Kolker" wrote:
>
> > On Wednsday, March 14, well known thriller
> > writer Robert Ludlum bequeathed to us his
> > latest work --- The Ludlum Cessation --.
> >
> > He died of a heart attack (at least that
> > is what the People in Charge want us
> > to think) in Naples FL.
> >
> > Bob Kolker
>
> nope never heard of him. Ya loveable ol kook
>
---------------------------------------------------------------
Nich Hills wrote on 7 July 2000:
> Stephen Holland wrote:
> > research@amroth.zetnet.co.uk (Phil Edwards) writes:
> > > Read for comprehension, Stephen, you ignorant Commie.
> > Sorry, I was doing my stint of national solidarity with the
> > worker in the Danish rice paddies instead of studying the collected
> > wisdon of Bob "Kill the (&#%$ Postmen" Kolker. I repent and promise
> > to try to be a better collectivist drone in the future.
> Stephen,
>
> Having just been called an ignorant Commie, you probably don't need a
> spelling flame as well. And nor would any polite person give you one.
>
> So. 'collected wisdon'? This put me in mind of a set of Wisden
> Cricketers Almanacks. WI Bob 'Death to Meter-Maids' Kolker was a
> cricket fan?
>
> Now we know that some cricket fans take the London Daily Telegraph. But
> most are no more eccentric than your average birdwatcher or
> trainspotter. Is it possible for a cricket fan to be as barking-mad,
> off-the-planet, lunar-Right as the Bob Kolker of OTL? Or would cricket
> be his salvation and redemption?
---------------------------------------------------------------
Douglas Holtsinger wrote on 19 June 1994:
> Here's my small collection of quotes from talk.abortion
> participants in support of their nomination as a collective
> Kook of the Month. Note that these are all quotes of
> pro-choicers in talk.abortion.
>
>
> "I read in todays Boston Globe (1/15/92) the story of an 8 (yes 8)
> year old
> Mexican female who birthed a health 7.04 point boy by Cesarian
> Section.
> This little factoid is one of the best arguments not only for
> abortion,
> but for sterilization."
> -- Robert J Kolker, <C0wt7o.CsM@world.std.com>
>
>
> "I want to hear what you will say when the "camp of the saints" decide
> to
> migrate northword over a 2000 mile unfortified border and inflict
> their
> disgusting reproductive habits on the rest of us. If that little
> girl is
> any indication, our soon to be new visitors will breed 10 generations
> a
> century and you and I will have to pay for it."
>
> "Frankly I am not in favor of involuntary anything (including
> sterilization), niether am I in favor of being taxed to support these
> discultured primitives. Let'em starve, a *give* away sterilizations
> for free."
> -- Robert J Kolker, <C0ytpq.3CG@world.std.com>
-- Try http://csf.colorado.edu/pkt/pktauthors/Vienneau.Robert/Bukharin.html To solve Linear Programs: .../LPSolver.html r c A game: .../Keynes.html v s a Whether strength of body or of mind, or wisdom, or i m p virtue, are found in proportion to the power or wealth e a e of a man is a question fit perhaps to be discussed by n e . slaves in the hearing of their masters, but highly @ r c m unbecoming to reasonable and free men in search of d o the truth. -- Rousseau
- Next message: Grinch: "Re: Cheap oil forever!"
- Previous message: Michael Vilkin: "Re: Aggregate debt"
- In reply to: Robert J. Kolker: "Re: More on Ecological Economics."
- Next in thread: Psalm 110: "Re: More on Ecological Economics."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|