Re: SHELL Oil chief admits CO2 output rate is very worrying
From: Robert J. Kolker (robert_kolker_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 06/21/04
- Next message: *** Eastman: "Re: ELEMENTARY 9-11 -- insider guilt established by new evidence"
- Previous message: Brandon Berg: "Re: SHELL Oil chief admits CO2 output rate is very worrying"
- In reply to: Brandon Berg: "Re: SHELL Oil chief admits CO2 output rate is very worrying"
- Next in thread: Angelo Campanella: "Re: SHELL Oil chief admits CO2 output rate is very worrying"
- Reply: Angelo Campanella: "Re: SHELL Oil chief admits CO2 output rate is very worrying"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 00:53:20 GMT
Brandon Berg wrote:
>
> Aside from portability issues, are uranium reserves sufficient to meet the
> world's energy needs for any great length of time?
Yes. Particularly if we use breeder reactors.
Best of all, if feasible, is geothermal heat. We have a heat source
already in place radiating and conducting its energy away. Why not tap
into it, if we can. We probably have enough energy there for a hundred
million years, and we will be extinct long before that.
Bob Kolker
- Next message: *** Eastman: "Re: ELEMENTARY 9-11 -- insider guilt established by new evidence"
- Previous message: Brandon Berg: "Re: SHELL Oil chief admits CO2 output rate is very worrying"
- In reply to: Brandon Berg: "Re: SHELL Oil chief admits CO2 output rate is very worrying"
- Next in thread: Angelo Campanella: "Re: SHELL Oil chief admits CO2 output rate is very worrying"
- Reply: Angelo Campanella: "Re: SHELL Oil chief admits CO2 output rate is very worrying"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Loading