Re: ELEMENTARY 9-11 -- insider guilt established by new evidence

From: *** Eastman (silver_at_nwinfo.net)
Date: 06/21/04 

Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 17:35:35 -0700

Subject: David Ickes and Brian Desborough join John Judge, Webfairy,
Ruppert, Rivero, Michael Moore as stars in the 9-11 Investigation sabotage
disinfo artist hall of fame

I am not surprised.

David Icke has never responded to any of my letters directing him to the
critical Pentagon evidence -- the same treatment I get from Rivero, Ruppert,
Michael Moore -- Icke, from his rejecting the hard and conclusive
evidence in favor of this impossible story, just brought to my attention,
has revealed himself as a co-conspirator obstructing justice to protect the
mass-murdering traitors in the Pentagon and White House.

Thank you Jason Christie for bringing this hatchet job from Icke's site to
my attention.

*** Eastman
Yakima, Washington

---------

 "Jason Christie" <jasonzc@yahoo.com>
Date:Sun, 20 Jun 2004 12:43:42 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:[pentagon911] More On David Icke as Possible Disinformationalist

I just downloaded a document that is available on
David Icke's website.
http://www.davidicke.net/tellthetruth/conspiracy/thedisaster.pdf

It's called

The 9/11 Disaster
The Myth and Reality
by Brian Desborough

What I find puzzling are these paragraphs:

-------------------------
Two French journalists have generated a great deal of
publicity by suggesting that the Flight 77 aircraft
did not crash into the Pentagon. Their conjecture is
based upon the fact that the width of the gaping hole
made in the Pentagon's outer wall was narrower than
that of the airliner's wingspan, and the apparent lack
of aircraft wreckage in some video footage. Since the
aircraft purportedly was in a spiral dive at the
moment of impact, the ill-fated airliner would have
been banked, not in horizontal flight when it hit the
Pentagon. The width of the gaping hole in the
Pentagon's wall accordingly would be narrower than the
wingspan of the aircraft.

When a cannon shell penetrates a concrete wall, the
shell fragments are found on the far side of the wall,
not in front of it. In a similar manner, Flight 77,
travelling at almost 500 m.p.h., began to disintegrate
as it demolished the out wall of the Pentagon, but the
wreckage possessed sufficient kinetic energy and
velocity for it to be deposited inside of the
building. The writer has seen video footage of the
crash site which reveals aircraft wreckage and
fragments of the building's airconditioning system,
strewn inside the remains of that particular wing of
the Pentagon.

Moreover, a business associate of the writer told him
that his daughter occupied an office in the immediate
vicinity of the crash site. She apparently left her
office only a few minutes prior to the crash, and
confirmed seeing aircraft wreckage and pools of
unburned jet fuel.

-------------------------------

Read out of context, this sounds like any
anti-Pentagon conspiracy writer, even though it
appears in an article that is pro-9/11 conspiracy.

Now, this is really more about the author than Icke,
who doesn't necessarily endorse everything on his site
as gospel. But I am really curious as to why this
document goes out of its way to debunk any Pentagon
conspiracy, but goes on about mini-nukes, EMF weapons,
etc.

It smacks of exactly the same tactic Mr. Eastman has
been talking about: talk about anything but the
hardest piece of evidence of conspiracy, the Pentagon.

I did Google Brian, and found around 200 or so
references to him as a 9/11 research and illuminati
researcher. What odd views he has regarding 9/11.

------

Cheers,
Jason

No 757 Hit the Pentagon, You Idiot
http://www.bedoper.com/pentagon

================

eastman "best evidence" portal page:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911crimefile/message/14

also see:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagonconspiracy/message/78
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagonconspiracy/message/71
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/9-11-demonstrative-evidence-of-frameup/messages/1

Loading