Re: Inflation and Deflation
From: Bill Ryan (william_b_ryan_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 06/22/04
- Next message: John Turmel: "TURMEL: Throw your $7 vote to the Greens"
- Previous message: Igor Khavkine: "Re: Canadian national debt"
- In reply to: William F Hummel: "Re: Inflation and Deflation"
- Next in thread: Karl Hallowell: "Re: Inflation and Deflation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 21 Jun 2004 20:33:21 -0700
[Hummel] Your theory is right on target.
There are actually two types of money: (1)
base money issued by the central bank, and
(2) credit money issued by private banks.
-- [reply] No, it's all bank credit, so in the main there is only one type of money. The difference is the central bank is the central bank in the banking system. The conceptual "bank" is the banking system as a whole. The operative theorem is that loans create deposits and the repayment of loans cancel deposits. The purchases of securities by banks - including the central bank - are the functional equivalent to loans. --> [Hummel] All payments to and from the government involve the transfer of base money. -- [reply] Patently false. Mr. Hummel has been paying too much attention to Warren Mosler's crank theory. --> [Hummel] Base money is a credit against future taxes. -- [reply] It is not, if by "base money" he means Federal Reserve Bank credit. Warren Mosler's "state" theory is a resurrection of 1930s fascist economics. It's just that he is too poorly read to realize he thinks he invented something new. His highly paid "economist" sycophants wont tell him. They just take his money and stroke his ego; they put him down as "co-author" of "papers" in "academic journals." Federal Reserve Bank credit plus commercial bank credit in the fungible money supply is interchangeably acceptable in payment of taxes or anything else. Federal Reserve Bank credit is indistinguishable from commercial bank credit in the checks (or electronic transfers) tendered in the payment of taxes. --> [Hummel] Without the enforcement of taxes, base money could not retain its value. -- [reply] Bank credit has value because you can spend it to buy things, pay bills, or pay taxes, etc. Bank credit is the fungible combination of Federal Reserve Bank credit plus commercial bank credit. --> [Hummel] Neither custom nor legal tender status are sufficient because they guarantee nothing about real value. -- [reply] Mere assertion without historical basis. --> [Hummel] When one writes a check to buy something, he is authorizing his bank to debit his account and transfer that amount to the bank of the seller who then receives a new credit in his account. -- [reply] Conceptually, the "bank" is the banking system as a whole acting in concert. Our self-styled "expert" Mr. Hummel has here inserted the fallacious assumption that payment by check merely transfers pre- existing deposits from one account to another. If logic or facts get in the way, define them out of existence! In the creditary economy checks are not written in the aggregate against pre- existing deposits but lines of credit, which include pre-existing deposits. Hence, the level of deposits will increase or decrease with lending and borrowing. --> [Hummel] Credit money exists only as deposits in private banks. -- [reply] A false assumption in the form of a definition making it a subtle but pernicious fallacy. Mr. Hummel is truly "Mr. Definition" who argues "by definition" incessantly. Credit money in the form of deposits are deposits in banks, including the central bank. Federal Reserve Notes are Federal Reserve credit you can hold in your hand. --> [Hummel] Credit money retains value because banks are required to convert credit money into base money on demand, even though the conversion seldom occurs. -- [reply] In a central banking system, commercial bank depositors have the right within certain limits to have their deposits redeemed in central bank credit. -->
- Next message: John Turmel: "TURMEL: Throw your $7 vote to the Greens"
- Previous message: Igor Khavkine: "Re: Canadian national debt"
- In reply to: William F Hummel: "Re: Inflation and Deflation"
- Next in thread: Karl Hallowell: "Re: Inflation and Deflation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|